Sunday, June 11, 2023

Infallible and Literal? Nah...

An online article about the Southern Baptists and the issue of the ordination of women as pastors spurred me to make this response, which I posted in the comments section of the article:

In the Bible, women were the first witnesses to the Resurrection, telling the men who were fearful and hiding, and in at least one of the four DIFFERENT biblical stories of the Resurrection, the men dismissed what the women said.  The Bible also says God placed a dome over the earth at Creation. 

The Bible has to be interpreted with some thought, not blindly accepted word for word.  It was written in a far different time and culture, in languages that don't always necessarily translate directly into English, and has been "translated" by people with their own agendas. 

The books of the Bible were gathered and judged to be "scriptural" over 1,000 or more years by councils made up of people - men - who accepted some writings and rejected others.  The writings that were accepted by the numerous councils over the centuries were written by people giving expression to their faith.  They weren't "writing the Bible." 

We have to do the best we can to understand that expression, given the difficulties in translation and cultural awareness.  Taking it literally at every point, accepting it blindly, and condemning those who choose to be more thoughtful is lazy and irresponsible.  There is no virtue in venerating a book as a matter of faith.  In fact, that becomes idolatry, which runs counter to teachings within the book itself.


No comments:

Post a Comment